Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Coffee's Forgotten Cousin: A History of Campground Tea in America



“If I were a poet, I should write an ode to tea. The two things that a thoroughly weary man craves in the North Woods are tea and sleep in the order named.” -B.W. Mitchell, 1908


If you've ever stood over a canister stove waiting for water to boil so you can drop in a tea bag, congratulations: you're participating in a proud American tradition of not really trying. Unlike Britain or Australia, where tea-specific camping gear evolved its own dignified lineage — billy cans, purpose-built kettles, whole ceremonies around "putting the billy on" — American camping technology looked at all that and decided to build a better coffee percolator instead.

That could read as a small tragedy for tea. It isn't. It's simply what happens when equipment manufacturers follow demand rather than lead it, and for a hundred years the demand was suspiciously ambiguous. Tea in America hasn't always been the underdog it's often made out to be today — for most of the 19th century it was coffee's equal, not its casualty, and it went down swinging (in some cases, literally, over a camper's head — more on that shortly). It hasn't always had its own gear, either, and what it lacked in dedicated equipment it made up for by doing what resourceful trail companions have always done: making do with whatever pot was already on the fire, unwashed coffee residue and all. This is the story of how that happened, and of the surprisingly stubborn little rituals — swung pots, cloth strainers, and tea bags dropped into borrowed coffee pots — that kept tea limping gamely along.

The popular version of this story goes: Boston Tea Party, patriotic boycott, tea never recovers, coffee wins by default, the end, roll credits. It's tidy, it's satisfying, and it's wrong — the historical equivalent of blaming your entire adult life on one bad breakup in high school. Historical trade and consumption records show tea and coffee were fierce, genuinely neck-and-neck competitors throughout the entire 19th century and into the 20th — right up until the Second World War.[1] What actually happened is stranger, slower, and considerably less patriotic than a simple national grudge.


[Gunpowder green tea]

For one thing, Americans weren't drinking much British tea for most of that stretch, mostly out of spite dressed up as commerce. Independent America deliberately avoided the British trade monopolies running through India and Ceylon, and instead built its own direct transpacific shipping routes straight to East Asia.[2] The result was a very specific, very entrenched national taste: green tea, especially the tightly rolled "gunpowder" variety, dominated American tea drinking for most of the 19th century, far outselling black tea. By 1880, Japanese green tea alone accounted for 47 percent of all U.S. tea imports, with China supplying most of the rest.[3] Gunpowder tea's tight rolled leaves weren't just a stylistic flourish, either — that compact shape resisted moisture damage on the long sea crossing from Asia, which is more thought than most modern hikers put into their own snack packaging.

Green tea's dominance wasn't a niche curiosity confined to a few precious upper-crust sippers with pinkies aloft. It was mainstream enough to define the era's most iconic tea drink, which will surprise absolutely everyone who has ever ordered sweet tea at a diner south of the Mason-Dixon line. The 1879 iced tea recipe in Housekeeping in Old Virginia, one of the earliest written American iced tea recipes, calls for green tea, ice, and lemon — full stop, no sugar, no apology.[3] The beverage most people now picture as quintessentially Southern and quintessentially black-tea started life green, which is the kind of plot twist that would get a cookbook cancelled today.

So if tea wasn't losing to coffee for most of the 1800s, what changed? Global war, mostly, with an assist from marketing — history's two great disruptors of an otherwise perfectly good beverage. World War I and World War II both cut off the transpacific supply lines that had fed America's green tea habit for a century, severing trade with China and Japan just as it had always operated. Forced back onto the open British trade network it had spent a century pointedly ignoring, American consumers adapted to what was actually available: black tea from India.[4] The shift wasn't gradual — by the end of World War II, an estimated 99 percent of all tea consumed in America had become black tea.[4] Green tea, once the default, was functionally gone from the American cup almost overnight, evicted not by taste but by torpedoes.

Coffee, meanwhile, had its own wartime tailwind, and made the absolute most of it. U.S. coffee consumption climbed to an all-time peak of 46.4 gallons per capita in 1946, driven by the newly institutionalized workplace "coffee break" and by military rations that had put a tin cup of coffee in soldiers' hands for the better part of two world wars.[4] Tea had just lost its supply chain and its signature variety in the same decade coffee was hitting its high-water mark and cementing itself into the national workday — which is a far more interesting collapse than "everyone stayed mad about 1773," and considerably harder to fit on a commemorative tea towel.

The aftershocks are still visible in the numbers, like scar tissue. Industry data today shows black tea holding roughly 84 percent of the U.S. tea market, and about 80 percent of American tea consumption happening iced — a beverage still quietly compensating for a war that ended eighty years ago.[4]

It's also worth dispelling another myth while we're at it: that tea is somehow inherently feminine, a drink for dainty ladies and uncalloused man-boys who faint at the sight of a woodstove. That reputation is an accident of 20th-century marketing, not a fact about the leaf — and it's worth unpacking properly, which we'll get to once we've established that tea, historically, could absolutely kick your ass.

Whatever tea showed up at 19th-century American camps, it showed up as a genuinely popular national beverage, not a scrappy holdout — and it did not arrive subtly, or apologetically, or with a gentle steeping time. Lumberjack camps in particular have a well-documented reputation for tea brewed almost violently strong — the kind of tea anecdotally described as "strong enough to float an ax on," which is not a metric found in any modern tea-brewing guide but arguably should be. George Washington Sears, writing under the name Nessmuk in Woodcraft and Camping, offers a more affectionate description than that image suggests, describing the ideal camp brew as "the sort of tea that takes hold, lifts the hair, and disposes the drinker to hilariousness." That's not a complaint. That's a man recommending his tea the way other men recommend a good used truck — almost certainly the green, gunpowder-style tea that dominated American cups at the time. (To learn about other important figures check out Influential Figures in Backpacking History)

The method behind that strength was blunt and entirely uninterested in your opinion: a scoop of loose leaf — roughly a tablespoon, about 3 grams — per cup, plus an extra scoop "for the pot," boiled directly in the water rather than steeped politely off to the side like some kind of houseguest. Run the numbers and the old-timers weren't exaggerating for effect. A scoop-per-cup ratio in a typical camp pot works out to something like 3.5–4 grams of leaf per 8 ounces of water — already in coffee's caffeine range — and because the leaves were boiled for an extended stretch rather than given a gentle 2–3 minute steep, extraction ran high. A normal cup of green tea, brewed properly, yields something like 20–45 milligrams of caffeine. Double the leaf and boil it hard, and you're plausibly looking at 60–100 milligrams a cup — solidly in drip-coffee territory — and some camp cooks pushed it further still, keeping the pot at a rolling boil for ten minutes or more for what was affectionately called "overboiled" tea, a phrase that does a lot of quiet, honest work.[5] It tasted like bitter tannin and unresolved ambition. It also worked, which — for a beverage that, at the time, had every right to consider itself coffee's equal — was really the only requirement that mattered.

Of course, being the dedicated researcher and manly outdoorsman I am, I had to try this old school tea recipe. The first sip arrived almost deceptively gentle — a soft, grassy nothing, coy about what it had in store. I'd taken it plain, the way a lumberjack would have: no sugar, no milk, nothing to cushion the blow. Then the aftertaste turned traitor. A bitterness crept in like wet cardboard dissolving on the tongue, sharp enough to pull my lips into an involuntary unmanly pucker, and my mouth went bone-dry — that unpleasant medicinal-cotton feeling of a mouth gone suddenly, uncomfortably parched. Underneath it all lingered something faintly sulfurous, like tea steeped with well water that had spent too long brooding underground. I expected the bitterness to fade in a minute or two, the way bad coffee does. Instead, it settled in for the long haul, coating the back of my throat for the better part of an hour — a low, chalky ghost of a beverage, unwilling to leave the premises. The next day, in the name of science and poor judgment, I tortured myself again, this time with sugar. A generous dose softened the bitterness, technically, but did nothing for the dry aftertaste, which remained parked at the back of my throat like it had signed a lease. This is a recipe best left to history and burley lumberjacks.

None of that old-timey camp tea arrived pre-strained. A delicate mesh or perforated tin tea steeper or strainer was one more tiny thing to break, lose, or clean with precious water supplies — an unacceptable liability in a life already full of axes. Camp cooks bypassed strainers entirely by relying on simple physics to keep leaves and coffee grounds out of their teeth, physics being free and widely available. There was no tea bag yet either, so getting the leaves back out of the pot required actual technique, and camp cooks developed a small toolkit of them, ranked roughly from showy to practical:

- Swinging the pot. The signature move, best documented in Australian "billy tea" culture but echoed in North American camps too: grab the pot by its handle and swing it in a full vertical circle over your head, using centrifugal force to fling the leaves to the bottom and sides so the clarified tea could be poured straight from the top. This was less a brewing technique than a demonstration — the kind of skill a dedicated camp cook performed as much for an audience as for the tea, roughly the 19th-century equivalent of flair bartending, and with similar odds of a mess. Writer Douglas Wood has treated this settling ritual, along with cousins like spoon-tapping and dropping an eggshell in the pot to draw the grounds down, as genuine camp folklore rather than mere technique — ceremony as much as craft.[6]

- Pouring off the leaves. The unglamorous default, and the choice of anyone who has ever burned themselves before breakfast: let the leaves settle to the bottom, then pour carefully, sometimes holding a spoon, lid, or flat plate at the pot's mouth to catch stray floaters on the way out.

- A scrap of cloth. Stretched over a cup or held between pot and cup, an old shirt or bit of cheesecloth caught both whole leaves and the finer sediment. In a camp without a dedicated strainer — which was most camps — this was the workhorse method, and a fairly firm argument for never asking too many questions about the shirt in question.

None of it required specialized gear. All of it required a person willing to fuss with hot tea leaves by firelight, which is really the whole story of American camp tea in miniature: not a lack of ingenuity, but ingenuity spent on technique rather than tools. Also, none of those methods are posh or feminine. There is no porcelain, milk, or sugar in camp. Only hot, black, bitter liquid, sometimes filtered through a highly questionable piece of old fabric that had, at some point, definitely been a shirt.

That toughness is worth dwelling on, because it cuts directly against the other myth this essay set out to retire. Tea's reputation as a dainty, feminine drink is a 20th-century invention, not an inherited truth, and somebody should really tell the lumberjacks. Chasing the female household shopper who did most of the era's grocery buying, tea advertisers in the early 20th century leaned hard into lace-and-porcelain imagery, and — by some accounts — went too far down this path leading to a slow shift that resulted in tea's modern feminine milieu. Coffee's own tough-guy image — black, unsweetened, served in a battered tin cup — got the same treatment from the opposite direction, manufactured by 20th-century advertising rather than discovered in the bean. Neither beverage was born gendered. Both simply got dressed by copywriters trying to move product, and tea got handed the worse outfit. (To read about coffee on the trail visit The History Of Backpacking Coffee Gear)



[Nesting Camp Cook Set, c. 1920s]


Survey 19th-century American camping equipment lists — pioneers, surveyors, prospectors, weekend campers alike — and the pattern holds steady, and steadily unglamorous: iron cookpots, frypans, tin pots and pails.[7] A dedicated teapot, in copper or tin, was common enough back home in American parlors and kitchens, where nobody was worried about pack weight. At camp, that same all-purpose pot made coffee, then made tea, crumbs and all — because, as one historical-reenactment discussion of 18th- and 19th-century gear bluntly concluded, most people camping outdoors weren't going to carry a proper tea kettle when a pot or tin cup did the job just as well.[8] Efficiency, it turns out, has always outranked etiquette in the woods.


[Turn of the century era copper tea kettle]

Tin was by far the dominant material of camp cookware, on the reasonable grounds that it was cheap and nobody cried if you dented it. Copper was also present but how popular it was is difficult to ascertain. What is clear is that it was more expensive. Not everyone skipped it, though. Campers who could afford one did sometimes bring a copper pot into the field — copper boiled water faster, resisted corrosion, and was durable enough to be repaired and handed down for decades, which made it as much an heirloom as a tool, and possibly the only camping item anyone has ever willed to a grandchild. But this was a comfort of the upper classes rather than a standard kit item. A 1900 issue of Field and Stream discussing camp equipment reflects exactly that split — copper for those who could justify the expense, tin for everyone else.[9] Cookware had its own small material hierarchy, largely split along class lines, because apparently nothing in America escapes that.


[Magazine ad for Sternau & Co. tea kettle, c. 1914]

We shouldn't assume the all-purpose pot had the field entirely to itself. Tea kettles remained genuinely popular in mountaineering circles, and camp-specific designs were manufactured and carried by people who simply preferred tea to coffee, whether they were headed up a mountain or setting up beside a lake, budget and pack weight be damned. A 1914 advertisement for Sternau & Co.'s line of camp stoves and pots features a stove designed to burn Sterno fuel and sold together with a matching tea kettle (above). ("Sterno" referred to the canned fuel and was a product of parent company "S. Sternau & Co." maker of metal teapots, percolators, and chafing dishes) 

[White Enamelware tea kettle, c. 1870s-1930s]


[blue and white speckled enamel tea kettle, c. 1970s]

[aluminum tea kettle w/ wooden handle and short spout, c. 1900s-1950s]


Camping-equipment catalogs of the era regularly featured tea kettles in a range of sizes and materials, with aluminum and enameled steel or tin the most common choices through the late 19th and 20th centuries. What distinguished these from an ordinary household kettle was packability: folding handles, short stubby spouts, and a deliberate emphasis on shaving off weight, ounce by grudging ounce. The materials have changed little down to the present. 

[Sternau & Co. tea kettle w/ vent fins and integrated spirit burner, c. 1930s]
[bottom view of a copper variant]

Some of these designs got genuinely inventive, in the way that only a very specific kind of hobbyist gets inventive about a kettle. A early-century Sternau & Co. brass kettle included bottom vent fins engineered to capture more of the flame's heat and improve fuel efficiency — quietly anticipating Jetboil's whole selling point by more than half a century, and getting considerably less credit for it. It also shipped with a dedicated spirit burner, letting a camper brew tea mid-afternoon without bothering to build a full fire, a level of commitment to teatime that borders on the diplomatic. Dedicated spirit stoves were never standard camp equipment, but they turn up often enough to prove that tea drinkers were occasionally willing to carry specialized gear, ritual apparently being worth its weight in brass. Also, notice the short stubby spout which improved portability (above).

Even so, dedicated tea kettles were never the norm for non-mountaineering backpackers, then or now. They show up far more often in the kit of horse packers, canoe campers, and car campers — people who can afford the extra weight of a single-purpose tool because a horse, canoe, or trunk is doing the carrying for them. Anyone traveling on foot tended to default back to the versatile pot that could boil coffee, tea, or dinner with equal, unbothered indifference.

Even during the decades when tea and coffee were running neck and neck, the bulk of the era's engineering effort still went toward coffee, for reasons no one has ever satisfactorily explained. The percolator came along in its modern form in 1889, invented by Hanson Goodrich.[10, 11] Once companies began marketing camp-specific percolators in the 20th century, the percolator became the iconic campfire vessel, a bubbling glass-topped status symbol of a beverage that had, by then, essentially won by default. If a tea drinker wanted hot water at a campsite from that point forward, odds are they were boiling it in a pot designed and marketed entirely with coffee in mind, tea's presence in it purely incidental. This pattern held well into the 21st century, though it never fully crowded tea out of the picture. It is worth noting that outside America, the variety of tea preparation was far greater: tea was whisked in Japan, brewed gongfu-style in China, or churned with butter in Tibet.

Tea cultivation in the U.S. began near Charleston, South Carolina, in the 1790s, and continues today, although it has always remained in the shadow of imported varieties — a domestic underdog within an already underdog beverage. Even so, it helped cement tea as a staple beverage in the South. The earliest written sweet tea recipes appeared in Southern cookbooks starting in 1879 — the same year Housekeeping in Old Virginia was calling for green tea in its iced tea — with the version that became the regional standard published in 1928 in Henrietta Stanley Dull's Southern Cooking, by which point black tea had taken over, having quietly won the war of attrition while nobody was looking.[12, 13, 14]

Sweet tea became the dominant style for Americans in the 20th century. This has played a large role in keeping tea out of the campground, especially the backcountry camp, where a jug of syrup-sweet tea is a genuine liability. But don't doubt the ingenuity of campers or backpackers, who have never once let inconvenience stand between them and a beverage they were determined to have.

A 1923 issue of Outdoor Life recommended the vacuum-insulated bottle as "a growing necessity," noting that in summer it supplied "the camper with ice tea, iced fruit juice or cracked ice for drinking water in an otherwise sun-baked world," while in colder months it carried hot soup, coffee, chocolate, or milk without the bother of lighting a fire.[15] Tea, tellingly, gets listed right alongside coffee here, uninvited but unbothered — proof that tea never actually left the conversation, even when nobody was specifically asking for it. Sweet tea still finds its way into camp today, as we'll see shortly.


[Modern tea bag]

If one piece of technology quietly carried tea through its coming mid-century upheaval, it was the tea bag — not because anyone invented it with camping in mind, but because it accidentally solved camping's actual problem with tea: mess and equipment, the two things a tired person at the end of a long hike has the least patience for. The most commonly told origin traces to New York tea merchant Thomas Sullivan, who around 1908 began shipping tea samples in small silk sachets; customers, rather than opening the bags for the loose leaves inside, simply dropped the whole sachet in hot water, and the convenience stuck, as convenience generally does once people realize the alternative involves cloth.[16] 

The fuller story is a little murkier — a Milwaukee-based patent for a similar "tea leaf holder" had already been filed in 1901 by Roberta C. Lawson and Mary Molaren, years before Sullivan's samples ever shipped — but Sullivan is the version that took hold in popular memory and, more importantly, in the marketplace, which is usually how these things get decided.[17] Once gauze and later paper versions went into mass production through the 1920s, tea no longer needed an infuser, a strainer, or a dedicated pot to steep cleanly. Any container that could hold hot water would do — a real convenience for green tea drinkers in the 1900s and 1910s, and later a lifeline for the black tea that replaced it once war cut the supply lines.

The tea bag meant a tea drinker could use exactly the same gear as a coffee drinker — the same pot, the same percolator — and still get a clean cup with zero specialized equipment, and zero of the ceremony that had defined camp tea for a century. In a real sense, the tea bag is the reason American camp-tea technology never had to become its own mainstream category: it let tea free-ride, comfortably, on coffee's infrastructure, which proved to be to its benefit as its sales took a back seat to coffee by the mid-20th century.

That convenience never quite killed off the dedicated kettle, though. Manufacturers kept making them in small numbers throughout the century, simply because tea aficionados kept asking for them — proof that the tea bag's ease never fully replaced the appeal of doing things properly, and that some people will always choose the harder, better tea.

Colin Fletcher — the closest thing backpacking has to a patron saint of gear obsession, a man who has opinions about socks — devotes real attention to tea preparation in The Complete Walker IV, admitting that even on backpacking trips he stopped mid-afternoon for a proper cup.[18] Despite decades in the United States, Fletcher never fully shed his British instincts on this point, though — somewhat to his own apparent surprise — he settled on Lipton bagged tea as his trail caffeine of choice, a brand no self-respecting British tea drinker would typically dignify with a second glance. Perhaps America rubbed off on him after all, one grocery-store tea bag at a time. Fletcher exemplifies the modern tea-obsessed camper, willing to trade a bit of pack weight for a reliable caffeine ritual and a small piece of home.

Fletcher lays out his options with real care, the way a man does when he has clearly thought about this far more than is strictly necessary. For hot tea on the trail, it's bagged, loose leaf, or the rarely-discussed instant tea powder, a category that exists mostly so people can say they've tried it once. For something cold, he tries powdered mixes like Crystal Light or Wyler's stirred into creek water — politely, but with clear reservations, the reservations of a man who knows better — and sun tea, a genuinely American invention where bagged tea steeps for hours in a clear bottle left in direct sunlight, no stove required, no effort expended, no complaints filed. By sheer coincidence, sun tea is a twentieth century invention that mirrors modern cold-soaking and is therefore easily adapted to the trail. Those last two methods are really backcountry versions of sweet tea, just cooled to whatever temperature the nearest creek happens to be rather than properly iced, and priced accordingly at zero dollars. (To see what other drinks campers have hydrated with see A Titillating Tail of Trail Hydration)

Today's trail-tea debates echo the ones coffee drinkers already have, right down to the moral tone. Tea bags, like disposable pour-over coffee bags, are convenient but leave a waste product that has to be packed out under leave-no-trace practice; ultralight purists tend to gravitate toward instant tea or powdered drink mixes for exactly that reason, weighing their tea options the way other people weigh mortgages; and loose-leaf devotees — the tea equivalent of the Moka pot coffee crowd — insist it's the only proper way to do it, strainer, spent leaves, and all, and will tell you so whether you asked or not. Having tried most of these approaches myself, I'll side with the loose-leaf purists on flavor. I'm also not above a Lipton bag on trail when the moment calls for speed over ceremony — which puts me, I suspect, in exactly the same camp as Fletcher, tea bag in one hand and quiet self-forgiveness in the other.


[Coleman 3 cup kettle w/ folding handle and integrated steeper basket, c. 1990s] 

Camp-specific tea kettles, for their part, have never disappeared. Brands like Coleman, GSI, MSR, and Firemaple have quietly kept packable, lightweight trail kettles in their lineups for decades, even though the format never went mainstream and probably never will. Today, numerous options proliferate across the Internet. One brand, Keith Titanium, is quietly pushing the bounds of reason with a line of titanium tea kettles and even teacups with accompanying saucer (below). Tea aficionados still carry them deep into the backcountry, however impractical that looks to a stove-and-pot purist standing there with his one multipurpose pot, silently judging. It's not so different from the coffee lover who accepts a few extra ounces of pack weight just to have a Moka pot at camp — a small, willing tax paid for doing the ritual properly, and a tax the rest of us politely decline to pay.


[Keith Titanium, Ti3601, teacup w/ saucer and spoon, c. 2026]

American camping tea technology, in the end, isn't a story about a beverage losing early and limping along in coffee's shadow, whatever the Boston Tea Party mythology would have you believe. For most of the 19th century, tea — specifically green tea, sourced directly from Asia rather than through British hands, out of a stubbornness that has never really left the American character — was every bit coffee's equal, and the tea that showed up at lumberjack camps and frontier fires reflected that popularity, not some scrappy minority habit clinging on by its fingernails. What actually reshaped tea's fortunes was two world wars severing the transpacific trade that had fed it for a century, and a coffee industry that used the same period to lock in workplace rituals and military habits that have stuck ever since — the same period, not incidentally, that invented both tea's feminine reputation and coffee's tough-guy one, two marketing decisions still quietly shaping what people feel comfortable ordering. 

Camping gear, for its part, mostly didn't care which beverage was winning — it was built around coffee's needs from the start, green tea or black, popular or not — though a persistent, minor tradition of dedicated tea kettles proves that "mostly" was never "entirely." What's left is a quieter kind of trail tradition than the "coffee always won" version suggests: a lumberjack's overboiled pot of gunpowder green, a scrap of cloth stretched over a tin cup, a Sternau kettle with its clever vent fins, and — decades after the supply lines changed everything — a British expat conceding, against his own expectations, that a Lipton bag would do just fine.


by David F. Garner


Other Articles We Suggest


The Hidden Landscape of Backpacking: Why Your Trip Begins At A Gas Station


Sources


1. Samantha Walsh, New-York Historical Society, "19th Century Americans & Tea," September 2, 2015, https://www.nyhistory.org/blogs/people-generally-are-improving-in-their-knowledge-of-good-tea-19th-century-americans-tea.

2. Harvard University DASH Repository, "A Brief History of Tea: The Rise and Fall of the Tea Importation Act," https://dash.harvard.edu/entities/publication/73120378-a060-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b.

3. Bruce Richardson, Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum, "History of Green Tea in America," accessed September 27, 2026, https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/history-of-green-tea.

4. U.S. Census Bureau, "National Hot Tea Month: January 2024," January 2024, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/stories/hot-tea-month.html.

5. Toby Richardson, Rough as Guts, "How to Make Billy Tea | An Australian Bush Tradition," accessed September 27, 2026, https://roughasguts.com.au/australiana/billy-tea-recipe/.

6. Douglas Wood, "Swinging the Coffee," accessed September 29, 2026, https://douglaswood.com/swinging-the-coffee/.

7. Gail Getz, Pennsylvania Heritage Magazine, "The Great Escape: Camping in the 19th Century," accessed October 1, 2026,
http://paheritage.wpengine.com/article/great-escape-camping-19th-century/.

8. The Muzzleloading Forum, "Copper tea kettle HC," March 28, 2025, accessed October 2, 2026, https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/threads/copper-tea-kettle-hc.193485/.

9. Marstyn Pogue, “Moccasin Tracks,” Field and Stream, 1900-09, Vol. 5, Iss. 8, 477, Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/sim_field-stream_1900-09_5_8.

10. Kate MacDonnell, Corner Coffee Store, "When Was the Coffee Percolator Invented? History, Facts & FAQ," accessed September 28, 2026, https://cornercoffeestore.com/when-was-coffee-percolator-invented/.

11. Mr. and Mrs. Brew, "Percolator Brewing - History and How To," The Brew Adventures, accessed October 2, 2026, Percolator Brewing - History and How To — The Brew Adventures.

12. Sean Powers, Georgia Public Broadcasting, "Sweet Tea: A History Of The 'Nectar Of The South'," June 9, 2016, https://gpbnews.org/post/sweet-tea-history-nectar-south;

13. Royal Cup Coffee and Tea, "A Southern Treat: The History Behind Sweet Tea," July 30, 2019, https://www.royalcupcoffee.com/blog/articles/southern-treat-history-behind-sweet-tea;

14. Jessica Chambers, The Daily Meal, "The Not-So-Southern Origins Of Sweet Tea,"
https://www.thedailymeal.com/1336785/origins-sweet-tea/.

15. Claude P. Fordyce, “Week-end Outings,” Outdoor Life, 1923-09, Vol. 52, Iss. 3, p. 206, Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/sim_outdoor-life_1923-09_52_3.

16. UK Tea and Infusions Association, "The History of the Tea Bag," accessed October 4, 2026, https://www.tea.co.uk/the-history-of-the-tea-bag.

17. Kat Eschner, Smithsonian Magazine, "Ever Wonder Who Invented the Tea Bag?," December 15, 2016, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ever-wonder-who-invented-tea-bag-180961469/.

18. Colin Fletcher, The Complete Walker IV (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 419.






Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Sunrise in Tennessee by A.W. Spaulding




Below I have republished a short essay on the beauty of a sunrise in east Tennessee. It is by one of my favorite authors. I thought it was worth sharing because it so vividly captures the beauty of God's country.

Sunrise in Tennessee


It was a misty morning down in the Graysville Valley. But I had climbed a good six hundred feet above, and stood upon the rounded back of Black Oak Ridge. The boldest stars had scarcely yet withdrawn from sentry duty, and the stillness of the dawn lay over forest and stream, deeply accen- tuating the first shrill calls of birds and the far- coming sounds of hammer, ax, and voice.

Upon the lower stretches of the climbing road, a faint flush had appeared to touch the eastern sky, but from the summit the low-lying clouds hung leaden; the roseate promise to the valley- dwellers was delayed to the watcher upon the hill.

The seeming delay was timely; the faculties, made alert and receptive by the conditions of the hour, were yet incapable of drinking in all the beauty of the panorama. The world that lay be-tore me was wrapped in a wondrous robe, the enfolding vapors uniting with the clinging shadows to make a scene of weird and rare beauty. The soft white folds of the fog lay heavily in the hollows, and wreathed the wooded slopes with filmy laces. A few miles away, the river's course was revealed by the denser bank of mist, a low wall of white. Beyond, the prospect, dimming with the distance, was finally shut off in a maze of mingled clouds and mountains, so interlaced and deceptive that no eye could distinguish the one from the other.

About me, down the slope a little way, the dark- green livery of a band of pines, splashed with the crimson of some intermeddling oaks, formed as for a protecting guard; over their heads, in the near distance, the undulating forest, broken here and there with the clearings ringing the little cabins; beyond, the appearance of a watery mo- rass, pierced by straggling tree-tops, dotted with hilltop islets, and almost inviting the touch of a light-pressed foot,- the indefinable horizon,- mystery.

The glamour of the scene sank into the soul; the misty became mystical, a bridge leading to the unseen world. Almost, from the midst of the seas and pillars of cloud, I could discern the lofty pinnacles and the massive, glorious gates of the City of Promise, as John's eyes beheld them long ago.

The sky was now alight; its eastern face began to glow. The scattered clouds had been drawing nearer to the opening gates of day. One of the lowest caught the first shafts of the bright king, and, bathing itself in rosy light, tossed on the gleams to its nearest fellows. Swiftly the, colors passed, deepening, changing, spreading, the car- mine leaping from lower to greater heights, leaving a touch of gold, of rose, of amber, and of white, to flush and light the faces of the somber clouds. It was not gorgeousness, it was glory,- black, purple, leaden, and gray melting and mingling in the warmer colors, until even clearer could the fancy see the opening of the gates of Paradise. The mists that lay below maintained their ghostly uniform, but slowly, very slowly, deserted their ground, dissipated in the warming atmosphere.

Then, as I watched, suddenly, low down it seemed in the maze of clouds and mountains, struck in a little fiery crescent, half reversed. With rapid pace it climbed the cloud-steps, growing in size, rounding in shape, barred and flecked with heavy masses of dark clouds. Though angry red, the eye could rest with ease upon its huge round face. As it rose, it worked. Its glowing heralds it recalled from cloud and sky, the greeters of its coming scattered from before its face, the mists shrank into nothing, or here and there rose to join their higher fellows. The light, first softly diffused, now glowed and streamed, and bathed the hills, the tree-tops, and the slopes; then, glancing over, struck the gray cliffs of the mountains behind, and all the world saw a new day. It was a sunrise of prophecy.

Again I stood upon the heights, at a little different vantage-point, and watched for the coming of the Day-Ruler. It was a little nearer the sunrising, and life was more fully astir. The scattered crows in the woods about me had sent forth their gathering cry, and joining the marshaled bands, were passing down into the valley on their daily foray. The clanging of cow-bells, mellowed by distance, came musically up the slope, and from near a cabin, half hidden among the hills, was borne the strong yodel of a boy's voice.

Above, the light cirrus sentinels of the small cloud-army flecked a paling blue; and below, massing as if to repulse an attack in the rear, the dark host awaited the onset. Low down they hung, and though no intervening mists shut the distant mountains of the Blue Ridge from view, beyond, through its gaps, could be dimly seen a cloudy counterfeit of another range. Color there was none, except the pale lightening of the sky.

Like Abraham, I thought, upon some height of the Plains of Mamre in the early morning, I stood straining my eyes over Canaan's hills against the far mountains of Moab. Suddenly, through a cleft of the distant range, a dull glow spread and deepened, and as I watched, its flame sprang along the seeming narrow valley, until in startling dis- tinctness were revealed in molten conflagration the cities of the plain. The uncapped expanse of a great furnace it seemed, as it gleamed and as- cended in masses of fire, to break, and die, and shoot again; and through the haze of its smoke, upon the hills behind was cast the dull glare of its reflection.

From far behind, streamers of light, like the rays of borealis, but steadily, spread over the eastern sky almost to the zenith; and then, against the background of dark and light, of coloring cloud and brightening sky, a little, flying, vapory roll, pushed by some wayward wisp of wind, infolding and turning upon itself, sped like the accusing parchment that Zechariah saw shaken over the land. My eyes passed downward again to the smitten plains, but all their fire had sunk in ashes; until over the cloud-hills behind rose the triumphant face of the mighty worker of these wonders, whose going forth is as the coming of a bridegroom out of his chamber, and rejoicing as a strong man to run a race, by whose hand the Lord teacheth the simple, and giveth eyes to the dull of sight. It had been a sunrise of history.

By A. W. Spaulding.

Printed in The Youth Instructor Feb 12, 1903. Pg 3


Other Popular Articles You May Enjoy:




Friday, October 23, 2026

From Almanacs to Satellites: How Campers Have Predicted the Weather from the 1860s to Today

 


 
 

"...a dull, heavy sound came up from the depths of the forest,—a solemn, ominous sound, breaking the dead silence. Another and another followed; a muffled roar, filling the air, so that one might not tell from what quarter it came.

"Yes," said John, as the noise died away,—"yes, it will rain. The old trees never lie. Those sounds you have just heard are made by falling trees. You always hear them before a storm."

"But, John," I exclaimed, "what makes them fall this morning? There is not a breath of air stirring."

"I don't know," responded John, "what makes them fall. I have often thought how queer it is.

Many a time have I sat in my canoe on a morning like this, when there was not wind enough to float a feather, and seen the old fellows come crashing down. I tell you what," continued he, "it makes a man feel solemn, to see tree after tree, great, giant chaps, a hundred and fifty feet high, begin all of a sudden to quiver and reel, and then fall headlong to the ground; when, for aught you can see, there is no earthly cause for it. Let us sit still a moment and hear them."

I did as requested. Now, far away in the forest, the same dull, heavy roar would arise, linger a moment in the air, then die away. Then, nigh at hand, a rushing sound, as the broom-like top of some mighty pine swept through the air, would fall upon the ear, followed by the crash of broken boughs and the heavy thump of the huge trunk as it smote the earth. Then, far away, half smothered between the mountains, would rise again the dull roar, and we knew another monarch of the woods had yielded its life at an unknown summons.

I am free to confess, that John's remark as to the effect of such a phenomenon upon one, was then and there fully verified by myself. I know nothing more mysteriously solemn than this sound of falling trees coming up from the forest,—falling, so far as you can see, without cause. What unseen hand smites them? What pressure, unfelt by man, pushes their vast trunks over? Is it to the Spirit of the coming Storm they bow, prostrating themselves in anticipation of his chariot's approach? Is there some subtle and hostile chemistry in the air which penetrates their fibres, weakening them to their fall? Or do these aged patriarchs of the wood, with fearful prophecy, foresee their hour of doom, and, in the breathless lull ere the tempest breaks, yield like an ancient Roman to their fate?

"Perchance," I said to John, "He who noteth the falling of a sparrow and marketh the boundary of human life, hath given the trees a limit also, which they may not pass; and these are being summoned, and so go down."

— William H.H. Murray, Adventures in the Wilderness (1869), p. 104


Imagine preparing for a camping trip in 1869. There is no weather app. No radar. No television meteorologist. No hourly forecast. There is not even the friend who "heard it might rain," because in 1869 that friend was guessing too. If you wanted to know whether rain was coming, you might consult an almanac, read the local newspaper, study the clouds, or simply rely on experience, folklore, and a general sense of foreboding.

Yet those campers were not necessarily reckless. They used the best forecasting tools available to them. It was a short list, but they used it thoroughly. The story of how outdoor enthusiasts have predicted the weather over the last 160 years closely parallels the story of technological progress itself. From folk wisdom and printed almanacs to radio broadcasts, television forecasts, internet weather services, smartphones, and satellite communicators, campers have continually gained new ways to answer a timeless question: What's the weather going to do?

 A Timeline of Camping Weather Forecasts
 
| Era | How campers got the forecast |
 
| Before 1870 | Weather lore, local observation, almanacs |
| 1870s–1920s | Telegraph forecasts and newspapers |
| 1920s–1950s | Radio forecasts become widespread |
| 1950s–1980s | Television weather reports dominate |
| 1980s–1990s | The Weather Channel and computer forecasting advances |
| 1990s–2000s | Internet weather services |
| 2007–present | Smartphone weather apps |
| 2010s–present | Satellite communicators deliver forecasts in remote backcountry |


For much of the nineteenth century, weather prediction rested on observation and tradition rather than organized science. Campers, farmers, hunters, and travelers relied on weather lore passed down through generations. Popular sayings such as "Red sky at night, sailor's delight; red sky in morning, sailor's warning" were common throughout rural America.[1] Rhymes were the preferred format, presumably because a forecast that rhymes is easier to remember than one that is correct.

Many signs focused on animal behavior, cloud formations, wind direction, and atmospheric changes. Some had a scientific basis. Others were little more than superstition. Telling them apart was left as an exercise for the camper. Regardless of accuracy, such observations were often the most practical forecasting tools available to someone heading into the woods in the 1860s. Experienced outdoorsmen learned to watch the sky carefully. Long before meteorologists issued forecasts, nature itself served as the weather service.

The passage above is a good example of how that "weather service" worked in practice: a real observation attached to an uncertain explanation. It comes from Murray's account of camp life in the Adirondacks, in which his guide, John, insists that the sound of falling trees always comes before a storm. John does not know why. He has simply watched it happen, which in 1869 counted as peer review.

Trees do fall in dead calm. Forest researchers have found that heartwood rot can cause trees to fail on their own, even in calm conditions, and one survey of a Great Lakes forest found that more than two-thirds of the large trees studied had some degree of heart rot. In the aging forests of the Adirondacks, a great many giants may have been a small push from failing. A hollow tree does not need a supernatural summons. Gravity is patient.

What John could not know was whether those falls actually signaled rain. I couldn't find a study that has tested that link, and the pattern may owe as much to memory as to meteorology: trees fall in fair weather too, but only the falls followed by rain got remembered. The stillness that made the sound so eerie may also be part of the answer. In windless air, with no rustle of leaves to mask it, a fall miles away could be heard where it normally would not be. A forest, it turns out, is much easier to eavesdrop on when nothing is talking over it.

John's sign was probably an honest observation, and the ominous meaning came from Murray's own flourish. Murray, for his part, was busy promoting the Adirondacks, and "an unseen hand smites them" makes better copy than "the tree was rotten." That combination of careful noticing and unproven inference is what forecasting by nature looked like in the 1800s.

By the mid-nineteenth century, almanacs had become one of America's most important sources of weather information. Publications such as The Old Farmer's Almanac offered long-range weather predictions, astronomical information, seasonal observations, planting calendars, and practical advice (see below).[2] For a family planning a summer camping excursion or extended travel, an almanac offered something valuable: a forecast months in advance. Whether that forecast was correct was a separate question, and one we'll return to.

 

 

[Excerpt of July weather from The Farmer’s Almanac 1850.]
 

Accuracy varied widely, but these publications enjoyed enormous popularity because better alternatives did not yet exist. In many rural communities, almanacs remained a trusted source of weather guidance well into the early twentieth century. A confident tone, it turns out, carries a long way. They occupied a unique place between folklore and science, combining observation, tradition, astronomy, and prediction into a single annual reference.[2]
Brief Detour: What a Camper in 1880 Would Have Known

Imagine you're preparing for a weeklong camping trip in the Adirondacks in 1880. You likely own an almanac. You probably read a local newspaper. If you're particularly experienced, you've spent years learning to read cloud formations and changing winds.

You might know:
✓ The season is expected to be wetter or drier than average according to an almanac.
✓ Local weather conditions reported in the newspaper.
✓ Traditional weather lore learned from family, farmers, hunters, or mariners.
✓ What the sky looks like right now.

You would not know:
✗ Whether a storm is currently forming two states away.
✗ What tomorrow's forecast will be with any certainty.
✗ Whether severe weather is approaching your campsite.

One of the most important advances in weather forecasting had nothing to do with meteorology itself. It was the invention and expansion of the telegraph. Before telegraph networks, weather reports traveled only as fast as people could carry them. By the time news of a storm reached the next town, the storm often had too. The telegraph changed this by allowing observations from distant locations to be transmitted rapidly across the country.[3]

Beginning in 1849, the Smithsonian Institution organized a growing network of observers who submitted weather reports by telegraph. By 1860, hundreds of stations were reporting conditions daily.[3] For the first time, meteorologists could see weather patterns developing over large regions rather than simply recording local conditions after storms arrived. Documenting a storm after it hit had, until then, been the state of the art. This capability eventually led to organized forecasting efforts.

In 1870, Congress authorized a national weather service under the U.S. Army Signal Corps, laying the foundation for what would later become the National Weather Service.[4] The Army may seem an odd home for a weather service, but the Signal Corps ran telegraphs, and telegraphs were the whole game. For campers and travelers, weather forecasting was no longer limited to local observation. Storms could increasingly be tracked as they moved from one area to another.

By the late nineteenth century, newspapers had become the primary means by which weather forecasts reached the public. Daily weather reports began appearing alongside national and local news. Weather maps and telegraph-based forecasts gave readers a much broader understanding of upcoming conditions than previous generations had ever enjoyed.[5]

A camper preparing for a weekend trip in 1895 could buy a morning paper and learn about weather systems developing hundreds of miles away. Forecasts were not always issued daily, and some covered several days or even a week at a time. Accuracy remained limited by modern standards, but the forecast was printed in ink, which has always lent a certain authority, and forecasting was becoming increasingly scientific. As newspapers improved, almanacs gradually lost their role as the principal source of weather prediction. They remained popular and widely read, but daily newspaper forecasts increasingly guided practical decisions involving travel and outdoor recreation.[5] Even so, if you time-travel back to a 19th century campground, Gore-Tex rain gear should be at the top of your packing list.
 
The arrival of radio in the 1920s transformed weather communication. Instead of reading forecasts in newspapers, Americans could hear updated information broadcast directly into their homes. Weather reports became a regular feature of radio programming, making forecasts more immediate and accessible than ever before.[5]
 
For campers and vacationing families, radio offered a major advantage. Weather information could be received shortly before departure instead of relying on a newspaper printed hours earlier. Severe weather warnings also became more effective. Communities could receive alerts quickly when storms threatened, improving public safety and reducing dependence on rumor or delayed reports. Rumor, which had long held a monopoly on the job, lost market share. By the mid-twentieth century, radio forecasts had largely surpassed almanacs as the primary source of practical weather information for most Americans.[5]

In this era, auto campers were the only ones who could bring a radio along to the campground, since the sets were large and heavy (see above). Even after transistor radios arrived, only some campers carried one on foot. Anyone counting ounces mostly decided the sky was lighter.

Brief Detour: What a Camper in 1925 Would Have Known

By 1925, camping had entered the automobile age. You can now listen to weather reports on the radio before leaving home. Newspapers provide increasingly sophisticated forecasts generated from telegraph-based observation networks. Compared to a camper in 1880, however, your confidence in the forecast is significantly higher.

You might know:
✓ Today's forecast.
✓ Regional weather trends.
✓ Storm warnings issued by forecasting agencies.

You would still not know:
✗ Real-time storm movement.
✗ Localized hourly forecasts.
✗ Mountain-specific weather conditions
Even as radio and newspapers improved forecasts at home, campers in federal parks and forests still depended on the people who ran them. In the early twentieth century, the ranger station was the central hub for weather information at many campgrounds. Rangers received forecasts at park headquarters by mail, telegraph, or telephone, then wrote out the daily report by hand and posted it on wooden bulletin boards at entrance stations and busy campgrounds (above). It was low-tech, durable, and immune to dead batteries.

Warnings also traveled by voice. Beginning in the 1920s, the National Park Service's evening campfire programs, best remembered for storytelling, gave rangers a way to warn a large group of campers about approaching weather, active wildlife, or trail closures. A captive audience with marshmallows remains hard to beat as a delivery system. Farther out, rangers on horseback patrolled deep into the backcountry, carrying message logs and warning dispersed campers directly or hand-delivering evacuation notices when a severe storm or forest fire approached.

Behind the scenes, the network kept growing. In the 1910s and 1920s, the U.S. Forest Service strung miles of single-wire telephone lines through trees across federal lands, letting rangers in remote fire lookout towers call down to base stations on crank telephones the moment they spotted lightning or smoke. In effect, the trees were drafted as utility poles. By the mid-1930s, federal agencies had begun adopting portable two-way radios. Rangers could receive instant weather updates from regional hubs and pass warnings to the public through bulletin boards or by telling campers to tune their car radios to local frequencies.[6]

Television weather forecasting emerged during the 1950s and became a central part of American life in the decades that followed (left). For the first time, viewers could actually see weather maps, fronts, pressure systems, and storm tracks. Fronts, previously a matter of faith, now came with arrows. Meteorologists could visually explain atmospheric developments rather than relying solely on spoken or printed descriptions.

This period also coincided with tremendous growth in recreational camping. Following World War II, improved highways, automobile ownership, and expanding public parks brought camping into the mainstream. Before departing for a campground or national park, many families checked the evening weather forecast. A meteorologist gesturing at a map became one of the most trusted people in the county. Meanwhile, advances in meteorological science continued. Forecasts benefited from weather balloons, radar systems, satellites, and increasingly powerful computers that made forecasting more accurate than ever before.[4]

Brief Detour: What a Camper in 1955 Would Have Known

The family station wagon is packed. Canvas tents and aluminum coolers are loaded. Before leaving for the campground, everyone gathers around the television. For the first time in history, weather can be seen as well as heard.

You might know:
✓ Forecast highs and lows.
✓ Rain chances for the next day or two.
✓ Storm locations shown on weather maps.
✓ Hurricane and severe weather warnings.

You would still lack:
✗ Interactive radar.
✗ Long-range detailed forecasts.
✗ Instant weather updates while traveling.
Almanacs never actually disappeared. The Old Farmer's Almanac and the Farmers' Almanac remain popular today, but their role changed significantly during the twentieth century. Throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s, almanacs filled a critical need because reliable daily forecasts were difficult to obtain. By the middle of the twentieth century, however, radio and television provided more timely information and increasingly accurate short-range forecasts.[5]

As a result, almanacs transitioned from practical forecasting tools to cultural and historical publications. Readers continued buying them for gardening information, astronomy content, folklore, recipes, and tradition, but most travelers relied on professional meteorological forecasts when making outdoor plans. (If you are curious what sort of recipes campers prepared in the past we explore that in Trail Grub and Trail Hydration).

One reason campers still buy almanacs today is the long-term forecast. I decided to test this myself. I have bought The Old Farmer's Almanac two years in a row, and I used it to plan my vacation time four to five months in advance for a few backpacking trips. I was remarkably surprised at how accurate the predictions about general seasonal trends were in both years. However, modern studies have found that almanacs' long-term predictions are rarely more accurate than a coin flip, and they should be trusted accordingly. So, either I got lucky in the two years I tried, or I'm incredibly gullible. The fact that I spent money on not one but two almanacs in the twenty-first century probably favors the latter.

A notable exemption from many guidebooks in the first century of recreational camping is weather forecasting. Nearly none I have referenced address the topic. One thorough 1961 guide nearly 600 pages long covers everything from air travel to underwear, but not weather forecasts. The lack of advice may simply be that the authors assumed people knew how to handle this task.

For weather enthusiasts, the launch of The Weather Channel in 1982 marked another major milestone. Weather information became available twenty-four hours a day. Campers could now check forecasts continuously instead of waiting for a scheduled segment during the news. All one had to do was survive the screeching, alien-like noise that served as the soundtrack of getting on the net in the 1990s.

Even more important was the rise of advanced computer forecasting models. Meteorologists gained increasingly sophisticated tools for simulating atmospheric conditions and predicting storm movement. Forecast accuracy steadily improved throughout the 1980s and 1990s, and outdoor enthusiasts planning backpacking trips, canoe expeditions, and mountain climbs benefited from forecasts that grew more detailed and reliable.

Brief Detour: What a Camper in 1995 Would Have Known

The internet is beginning to change everything. Before leaving for a camping trip, you might sit down at a desktop computer and pull up a weather website. For the first time, ordinary campers have access to many of the same forecasting tools previously reserved for meteorologists and government agencies. The challenge is that once you leave home, the forecast typically stays behind.

You can now access:
✓ Multi-day forecasts.
✓ Weather radar images.
✓ Satellite imagery.
✓ Regional weather discussions.
✓ Severe weather alerts.

The internet revolutionized weather forecasting for ordinary citizens. By the late 1990s and early 2000s, weather websites like weather.com (above) allowed users to access forecasts whenever they wanted. Radar images, satellite photographs, hourly forecasts, precipitation predictions, and severe weather alerts became available from home computers.[5]

Campers no longer needed to rely on generalized regional forecasts. They could examine detailed weather information for specific destinations, often days before departure. For many outdoor enthusiasts, weather forecasting shifted from a passive activity to an active one. Rather than simply consuming forecasts provided by newspapers or broadcasters, users began exploring large amounts of weather data themselves.

Forecasts also became more precise about altitude. Mountains generate their own weather, and temperatures typically fall several degrees Fahrenheit for every thousand feet climbed, so a forecast for the trailhead town can badly misjudge conditions at a high camp, a fact many hikers learn the hard way, usually in a T-shirt. Elevation-specific tools like Mountain-Forecast.com (below on right), along with the National Weather Service's forecast tables that list details such as the freezing level, let backpackers check conditions closer to the altitude where they will actually be.[7]

The introduction of smartphones brought perhaps the greatest change in everyday weather awareness. Modern weather applications deliver forecasts, radar imagery, severe weather alerts, lightning tracking, wind predictions, and detailed hourly data directly to users' pockets.

For campers, weather information is now available almost anywhere cellular service exists. Forecasts can be checked repeatedly before and during trips, allowing plans to be adjusted as conditions change.[7a] Compared to the newspapers and almanacs of the nineteenth century, the amount of available information is almost unimaginable. I routinely consult two to three weather apps before leaving on a trip to compare sources. I realize that makes me sound nerdy, but here you are reading an article about the history of weather forecasts. So who's nerdy now?

Most backpacking and camping trips last only three to four days, with the vast majority under a week. Modern forecasts are reliable enough that you can screenshot the forecast before leaving and trust it reasonably well for seven to eight days. Some websites offer forecasts fourteen days out or more, but experts advise treating anything beyond about eight days with caution, since it 

is right only about 50 to 60 percent of the time. Data that far out is better for general trends, such as cooler or warmer, wetter or drier than average.
 
One thing that has not changed is how ranger stations share weather reports. Today, weather warnings are still printed and posted on bulletin boards to inform campers. Technology has advanced enormously, but the humble bulletin board endures.

Despite all these advances, one problem persisted. Many of the most desirable camping and backpacking destinations remain beyond cellular coverage. For decades, campers venturing into remote wilderness areas often lost access to updated forecasts once they left civilization behind. Any weather information they carried into the backcountry was effectively frozen in time.Modern satellite communicators have largely solved that problem. Devices such as the Garmin inReach (left) can receive weather updates through satellite networks even when users are far beyond traditional cellular coverage. Backpackers, paddlers, hunters, and mountaineers can request updated forecasts deep within remote wilderness areas.[7b] (If you ever wondered what other sorts of electronics campers and backpackers have carried into the woods, check out Camper's Love-Hate Relationship with Electronics)

For today's camper, this capability would seem almost magical to someone from the 1860s. A person standing alone in a mountain valley can now receive weather information generated from satellites orbiting Earth, analyzed by supercomputers, and transmitted through space directly into the palm of their hand.

I have used such data on several occasions over the past ten years. I have found it most helpful on longer expeditions that last a week or more. For my weekend backpacking trips, it seemed more guy-with-gadgets than experienced-backpacker-extraordinaire. I always aim to look like the latter. Of course, this kind of backcountry access is not universal, because it still comes at a cost. Perhaps in the future it will become the default and we will all be as constantly connected to the weather as we are in the city. For now, we old-timers will continue to settle for the ancient tech: our eyeballs.

Brief Detour: What a Backpacker Knows Today

Imagine a backpacker standing beside an alpine lake hundreds of miles from the nearest city. They carry a smartphone, GPS receiver, digital maps, emergency communications equipment, and possibly a satellite communicator. This camper possesses more weather information than the most experienced meteorologist of the nineteenth century could have imagined. And yet, they still glance at the clouds.


They can potentially access:
✓ Hour-by-hour forecasts.
✓ Real-time radar.
✓ Lightning alerts.
✓ Wind predictions.
✓ Satellite imagery.
✓ Severe weather warnings.
✓ Updated forecasts delivered through satellite communications
The history of weather forecasting in camping reflects the broader history of technology itself. Campers progressed from weather folklore and annual almanacs to telegraph-based forecasting networks, daily newspapers, radio broadcasts, television weather reports, internet forecasting services, smartphones, and satellite communicators. Each technological advance brought greater accuracy, faster information, and improved safety.

Yet one thing has remained unchanged. Experienced campers still watch the sky. Cloud formations, shifting winds, falling temperatures, and distant thunder continue to provide clues that no technology can entirely replace. The tools have changed dramatically, but the instinct to pay attention to nature remains as valuable today as it was 160 years ago.

Modern experts still stress this instinct. Outdoor educators and organizations such as the Washington Trails Association and Backpacker recommend checking the forecast before leaving, then watching the clouds and pressure changes once on the trail.[8] For many people who live in cities, reading the sky has become something of a lost art, yet in the backcountry it fills the gap between forecast updates. These skills are not more accurate than a modern forecast, and no one should treat them as a replacement. What they offer is a real-time read on the sky right where you are standing, which can help you decide to take shelter instead of pressing on, even when the forecast says the weather should hold.[9] The forecast, after all, isn't the one standing under the cloud.

Whether a camper in 1869 studied a red sunset, a family in 1955 listened to a radio forecast, or a backpacker today requests an inReach weather update from a satellite hundreds of miles overhead, they are all trying to answer the same enduring question: Will tomorrow bring sunshine, or rain?


By David F. Garner


Appendix: Photos

                               

[Paddlers mount portable radio system with mobile antenna rig into canoe as proof of concept, c. 1920]
 
 

[Fire towers like this one at the summit of Mount Uncanoonuc in New Hampshire were also used in their early days to spot approaching severe weather. c. 1920s]


[Bulletin boards are one campground technology that has changed little over the years. c. 2018]



Sources

[1] National Weather Service. "Weather Lore and Folklore." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Available through the National Weather Service educational resources.


[2] The Old Farmer's Almanac. https://www.almanac.com


[3] National Weather Service. History of the National Weather Service Timeline. Discusses telegraph-based weather observation networks established by the Smithsonian beginning in 1849 and their role in forecasting. weather.gov


[4] National Weather Service. History of the National Weather Service. Notes creation of the U.S. weather forecasting service in 1870 and the technological progression from telegraphs to radar, satellites, and modern forecasting systems. weather.gov; popularmechanics.com


[5] National Weather Service. NOAA Weather Wire Service History. Describes the evolution of weather information distribution through telegraphs, radio, television, satellite communications, and internet delivery systems. weather.gov; en.wikipedia.org


[6] "History of Fire Lookouts in Snoqualmie," Snoqualmie Fire Lookouts, accessed September 22, 2026, https://www.snoqualmielookouts.org//lookout-history.


[7] "Hiking Weather Basics: The Complete Guide for Safe Trails." Goat Wanderlust. https://www.goatwanderlust.com/hiking-weather-basics/


[7a] Skurka, Andrew. "Tutorial: Predicting backcountry weather conditions." https://andrewskurka.com/backcountry-weather-conditions-forecasting-methods-sources/


[7b] "Reading Weather on the Trail: What Hikers Need to Know." Going Gear. https://goinggear.com/blogs/going-prepared/reading-weather-on-the-trail-what-hikers-need-to-know


[8] Washington Trails Association. "How to Predict Mountain Weather." https://www.wta.org/go-outside/trail-smarts/how-to/how-to-predict-mountain-weather


[9] Backpacker. "Backcountry Weather Forecasting Skills All Hikers Should Know." https://www.backpacker.com/skills/beginner-skills/backcountry-weather-forecasting/

 










Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Comfort on the Trail: A Bouncy History of Backpacking Sleeping Pads and Camping Mats

 



“Camping is the art of getting closer to nature while getting farther away from the nearest cold beverage, hot shower, and flush toilet.” — Anonymous


If you have ever wondered about the history of backpacking gear, the evolution of camping equipment, or why modern sleeping pads look nothing like the bedrolls and bough beds of earlier outdoor travelers, this is the surprisingly squishy corner of outdoor gear history where those stories meet.

Every camper eventually meets the same ancient question: how much misery is too much misery? A glowing sunset can make you feel profound, a crackling fire can make you feel heroic, and then one badly placed root under your hip can reduce the whole wilderness experience to a negotiation with your own spine. Humans have always had a complicated relationship with nature. Nature feeds us, inspires us, and gives us the kind of sunrise that makes a person briefly consider becoming a poet. It also gives us rocks under the hip, roots under the shoulder blade, cold ground, wet socks, and the occasional mosquito with personal ambitions. Living indoors solves many of these problems, but it also separates us from the good stuff. Camping is wonderful because it lets us choose our own level of discomfort. The camping mat is where that choice becomes very personal.
 
The “camping mat,” also known as the “sleeping pad,” or “worthless thing” after waking up sore, is a perfect symbol of this bargain. It is not the flashiest piece of outdoor gear. It does not gleam like a stove, slice like a knife, or make you look rugged like a catalog photo. But at 2:17 a.m., when the temperature drops and the ground begins explaining geology to your ribs, the humble mat becomes the most important object in the universe.
 
Campers have drawn their own lines around this bargain for centuries. Some believe a mat contaminates the purity of the outdoor experience and prefer to use whatever the forest floor provides. These are often the bushcraft types with strong opinions about what counts as “real” camping. At the other end are campers who treat the phrase “camping mattress” as an invitation to bring something roughly the size of a king-size Tempur-Pedic in an RV. Backpackers, naturally, live somewhere in the middle: forever chasing the dream of a bed that is light, warm, compact, durable, affordable, and somehow not terrible.
This essay follows the evolution of backpacking sleep mats because that is where the engineering gets especially fun—and where the compromises get especially ridiculous. 

The history of the sleeping pad touches almost every era of camping gear history, from vintage camping equipment and bushcraft bedding to ultralight backpacking gear and modern insulated pads. If you carry everything on your back, every ounce and cubic inch matters, but so does the ability to stand upright the next morning. A quick warning before we unroll this thing: the history of camping mats is surprisingly poorly chronicled. As far as I can tell, this may be one of the few attempts to trace the development of camp-mat technology across roughly 160 years. That makes the story a little patchy in places, but also more interesting. Like many good camping trips, it involves improvisation, questionable decisions, and a surprising amount of foam.

From Bough Beds to Backpacking Pads


[Tent with bough bed]
 
In the late nineteenth century, the common camp bed was not a product so much as a small landscaping project. Campers laid down a deep layer of fresh boughs, often about a foot thick, and covered it with a canvas or wool blanket. If they could get one, a rubber-coated blanket was even better. A waxed blanket could also help. The thickness depended on the season: lighter for summer, heavier for winter. William H. H. Murray, author of one of the first recreational camping guides, expected many readers to hire a professional guide for wilderness travel, so he did not dwell much on bed construction. Presumably, the guide knew which trees could be turned into a mattress and which ones would simply poke you all night.

John M. Gould’s 1877 guide, How To Camp Out, offered much more practical detail. Gould described how to make a camp bed and, importantly, recognized that not every camper wanted the same experience. Some wanted to travel light. Others wanted to sleep like people who had not personally offended the ground. For those traveling with a wagon, Gould recommended taking a mattress.

For backpackers, however, mattresses were still too large and bulky to be practical. The modern dedicated camping pad had not yet arrived, so anyone traveling on foot needed either ingenuity, tolerance, or a very forgiving spine. George Washington Sears, the legendary woodsman better known as “Nessmuk,” also favored the bough bed. In his 1884 classic Woodcraft and Camping, he described how to build one in detail. The message was clear: if you wanted comfort, first learn to become part carpenter, part botanist, and part forest-floor interior decorator.

Soldiers and hunters of this era often carried large sacks, sometimes called a “browse bag,” or a “tick” that could be stuffed with grasses, straw, or other material. Campers sometimes chose these as well. As we can see, beds made of natural debris were the main option for anyone traveling on foot. Natural materials were not always plentiful. [1] [2]

Debris was not the only solution though. Fur was common in colder climates. As Martin Hogue notes in Making Camp, humans have for centuries worn fur skins that doubled as parka and sleeping bag/mat. [3] Others opted for a raised bed. They would build a temporary cot using a piece of fabric or skin stretched over a wood frame improvised at camp from local materials. [4] In those days many things were made from local materials at camp including many menu items. For a history of food options in camp see Trail Grub.

For those that could afford the bulk, a portable mat could be made by hand stitching. A wool blanket would be folded in half and stitched around all the edges. Then this was stuffed with batting to the desired thickness while balancing weight and comfort. Batting was frequently made of wool, hair, kapok, or cotton. These were often referred to as kapok mattresses or horsehair mattresses. [5] The batting was generally stuffed loosely to allow the mat to be rolled or folded and strapped to the pack. These could also be purchased ready-made. They did not add significant comfort but they did add insulation between the camper and the ground. 



[Kapok style mat bedroll c. 1920s] 

Whatever a camper used underneath, nearly all carried the same basic gear. A water-resistant blanket that went underneath and could be folded over top, and a wool or fur blanket for insulation. These two essential items made up the bedroll. These can often be seen in period films like Civil War movies and Westerns. 

The Long, Leaky History of the Air Mattress


Air mattresses have been around longer than most think. Attempts to make them stretch as far back as the 16th century. A Frenchman named William Dujardin created a “wind bed” using waxed canvas. They were briefly popular in fashionable circles. They did not hold air well and quickly deflated along with Dujardin’s aspirations. [6]

A few centuries later, rubber succeeded where canvas failed. Moldable vulcanized rubber was patented in 1844 thanks to the obsessive work of Charles Goodyear. One 1850 account of a family crossing the frontier for the Gold Rush to California reported a rubber air mattress among their equipment. It was carried in their wagon and could be emptied each morning and stowed away till needed again. [7] Rubber also enabled more water-proof garments and blankets to keep out rain and moister.

[Ad for a rubberized blanket, c. 1920s]

It would be some time before the air mattress was light enough to carry in a backpack. They became popular for campers who traveled by wagon or boat. Mountaineers are the ones who first began carrying small inflatable mattresses in their packs. Clinton T. Dent describes his method in his 1892 book Mountaineering. He places the mattress inside the sleeping bag rather than outside. This implies the mattress was not insulated. [8]
 
[Ad for 1918 air mattress recommended by the U.S. Forest Service] 

By the early twentieth century, camping gear makers were also trying to solve the sleep problem by combining several pieces of equipment into one clever contraption. The sleeping bag, the mattress, and sometimes even the shelter were folded into integrated systems. Some were ingenious. Some were probably better admired in a catalog than carried into the woods. Either way, the period shows how unsettled outdoor sleep design still was. Campers wanted warmth, dryness, comfort, convenience, and a lighter load, but nobody had quite figured out how to give them all of it at once.

Early air mattresses were still bulky enough that they made the most sense for canoeists, horse travelers, car campers, and anyone else who was not counting every ounce. The line between sleeping bag and mattress also stayed blurry. Horace Kephart, one of the great early outdoor writers, described combined sleeping-bag-and-air-mattress systems with obvious appreciation but also with a practical camper’s skepticism.

“There are sleeping bags combined with air mattresses, full-length or only “body size,” that are good for canoe cruising, horseback journeys, or other trips when camp is changed every day or so and good sites are not always to be found. They save much work, and sometimes a good deal of anxiety. There is then no night wood to cut, no browse to gather, no tent to trench, and little bother about smoothing the ground. Wherever one may be, in damp forest or on sandy dune, on rocky ground or mucky ground, down goes the bundle, it is unrolled, and one inflates his “blow bed” with the bellows that nature gave him. In ten minutes he is assured of a dry, warm, elastic bed for the night, in spite of Jupiter Pluvius, or Boreas, or both of them allied. If water runs in on the floor, let it run. If the tent blows down, let it alone until you feel like getting up. Come morning there is no bed making to do, if you are too hurried to air things, except to deflate the mattress and roll the bag up. It straps into a waterproof pack that stows conveniently anywhere. But such a bed is quite expensive. For ordinary service, blankets and a bed tick will do just as well. In any case, study your health and your ease at night. There is a veteran’s wisdom in what Chauncey Thomas says: “I go camping to have a good time, and a third of that time is spent in bed.” [9]
[L.L. Bean sold a model that was the epitome of these strategies c. 1929]
 
As materials improved, the air mattress became a more serious piece of camp gear. One of the most recognizable mid-century names was Li-Lo. The company began selling compact inflatable mats in the 1930s and remained a familiar presence for decades, especially in the United Kingdom. Li-Lo also made pool floats, and the name eventually became one of those brand names people use as if it were the thing itself.

For campers, Li-Lo’s appeal was not just novelty. Its sleeping mats developed a reputation for durability, and some models used two separate air compartments so a single puncture would not necessarily ruin the night. A small round bellows could be carried for inflation, which spared campers from ending a long day by turning themselves lightheaded at bedtime.

Of course, not every camper bought a purpose-made air mattress. Outdoor people have always been good at improvising gear from whatever is lying around the garage, and some used bicycle inner tubes tucked between blankets as a homemade air bed. Boy Scouts were especially known for this sort of practical tinkering. It was not elegant, but elegance has never been a requirement for sleeping slightly better outdoors. To learn how campers have seen after dark to get ready for sleep read From Lanterns to Headlamps.

The problem was that air by itself did not solve everything. An air mattress could lift a camper off roots and stones, but it did little to stop heat from draining into the ground. Campers often still needed a wool blanket, pad, or other insulating layer underneath them. Comfort and insulation were related, but they were not the same problem. [10]

The 1950s brought lighter and tougher inflatable mats. Earlier air mattresses were often made of rubberized canvas, but Goodyear began producing camp air mattresses with rubberized nylon from DuPont. That change mattered: nylon helped reduce weight while keeping the mattress strong enough for actual outdoor use. [11]

Closed-Cell Foam and the Birth of the Modern Sleeping Pad


Even so, the inflatable mattress still had a cold-ground problem. The next major leap came not from a backpacking company but from foam chemistry. Ensolite, developed by the U.S. Rubber Company, was a closed-cell foam that trapped air inside tiny sealed pockets. It was light, resilient, and unusually useful anywhere insulation, cushioning, flotation, or impact absorption mattered. [12]

Ensolite appears to have entered outdoor use through military and cold-weather applications. The U.S. Air Force tested it in boots in 1951, and the material performed well enough that Ensolite-insulated boots were issued soon after. Civilian boots followed by 1953. [13] [14] From there, using the material under a sleeping bag was not a wild leap. Mountaineers, always willing to experiment if it meant surviving a colder night, seem to have recognized its value early. A 1954 Mount Rainier rescue report describes rescuers using an Ensolite pad with a sleeping bag to keep an injured climber warm; the pad even doubled as a sled across the snow. [15]

Once Ensolite proved useful, U.S. Rubber found applications everywhere. It appeared in winter clothing, gloves, flotation devices, and protective equipment. The same qualities that made it good under a sleeping bag—closed cells, trapped air, resilience, and low weight—also made it useful in life jackets, football helmets, knee pads, and gymnastics mats. A humble foam sleeping pad was part of a much broader mid-century material revolution.
 
[Ensolite pad atop a backpack c. 1980s]
 
For backpackers, the important point was simple: closed-cell foam could insulate without needing to be inflated. It could not pop, it could be cut to size, and it kept working when dirty, wet, dented, or abused. It was not luxurious. Nobody mistook a thin foam pad for a featherbed. But it changed the basic expectations for sleeping outside.

By the end of the 1950s, Ensolite was becoming recognizable as a camp sleeping pad. One of the earliest general camping-guide mentions appears in All About Camping from 1962, where Merrill discusses it in connection with snow camping. His advice closely echoes the U.S. Naval Medical School’s 1961 Polar Manual, which recommended placing an Ensolite pad on top of an air mattress such as a Li-Lo. [16] Colin Fletcher later gave Ensolite another boost by mentioning it in his influential 1968 book The Complete Walker. [17]

By the late 1960s and early 1970s, foam pads were moving from improvised or specialist use into ordinary camping retail. Stores sold them in several thicknesses and precut lengths. Backpackers learned to save weight by carrying three-quarter-length or even two-thirds-length pads, discovering that not every inch of a body required equal luxury. U.S. Rubber, renamed Uniroyal, also began selling pads directly to outdoor consumers, with advertisements appearing in newspapers and magazines during the 1970s. [18] (If you would like to learn about how camping permits have change since the midcentury, visit Papering The Wilderness)

Foam pads then multiplied. New brands and new formulations appeared, and Ensolite’s name became almost generic for a foam camp mat. The original material still compares respectably with some later products: a common one-quarter inch Ensolite pad had an R-value around 1.05. That is not a palace floor, but it is enough to make a cold night more survivable.

What makes Ensolite especially interesting is that its camping use seems to have grown organically. It was not born as a sleek backpacking lifestyle product. It was a useful industrial material that cold-weather travelers, soldiers, mountaineers, and eventually backpackers adopted because it solved a problem. That may be why it became so influential: it was not glamorous, but it worked.

While foam was gaining ground, inflatable mattresses were still evolving. Stebco, a major American air-mattress maker, supplied mattresses used on expeditions in the 1960s, showing that serious outdoor travelers had not abandoned air comfort just because foam had arrived. [19]


[Stebco air mattress c. 1960s]

Stebco is one of those names that deserves more attention in outdoor gear history. Before it became associated with portable air mattresses, the company had manufactured goods for the World War II war effort under the name Frank Mashek Company. By the postwar period, it was well positioned to turn industrial know-how into consumer outdoor gear.

In the 1950s, Stebco began selling portable air mattresses that appealed to mountaineers, campers, and eventually backpackers. [20] As backpacking surged in the 1960s and 1970s, Stebco marketed to people who wanted real sleep comfort but were still willing to carry some extra weight to get it. [21] For a while, Stebco produced some of the leading lightweight air mattresses on the market. But outdoor gear history is full of perfectly respectable products that were overtaken by one better idea. In Stebco’s case, that idea was the self-inflating, insulated sleeping pad. [22]

Therm-a-Rest and the Self-Inflating Backpacking Pad


That brings us to Therm-a-Rest, the brand that changed the category so completely that many campers now treat the self-inflating pad as if it had always existed. The idea began in 1971, when three avid climbers set out to make an air mattress that was also insulated. Production of the first model, the Standard 3/4, began in 1973. Two of the founders were former Boeing engineers, which feels exactly right: only backpackers would celebrate aerospace competence by sleeping on the ground. [23]

Therm-a-Rest arrived at the perfect moment. Recreational backpacking was growing fast, and a new generation of hikers wanted gear that was lighter, more compact, and more comfortable. Even so, the company did not become dominant overnight. Colin Fletcher did not mention Therm-a-Rest in The New Complete Walker in 1976. By The Complete Walker III in 1984, however, he was discussing the company as a major force that had surpassed much of the competition.


[Therm-a-Rest Standard 3/4 c. 1975]

The brilliance of the Therm-a-Rest design was that it joined cushioning and insulation in one package. Open-cell foam inside the mattress expanded when the valve opened, drawing in air; the foam also helped reduce heat loss. Fletcher praised the result, noting that Therm-a-Rest was at least as comfortable as an air mattress and insulated better than most foam pads. For backpackers, that combination was revolutionary.

Therm-a-Rest did not stop with self-inflating pads. In 1986 it introduced the RidgeRest, a roll-up closed-cell foam pad with ridges molded into the surface. The ridges trapped warmth, added some cushioning, and gave backpackers yet another object to strap awkwardly to the outside of a pack. Later, the company developed the folding accordion-style Z Lite, with its now-familiar egg-carton texture. The folding design solved one of the great foam-pad annoyances: the mat’s deep desire to curl itself back into a tube the moment you looked away. [24] [25]

The Z Lite became iconic because it was simple, durable, and nearly impossible to use incorrectly—although campers still managed to debate which side should face up. That is part of the charm of outdoor gear culture: give people a rectangle of foam and they will form schools of philosophy around it. Therm-a-Rest, under Cascade Designs, popularized this accordion-style folding pad and helped make it a standard sight on long-distance trails, often carried proudly on top of a pack like a yellow-and-silver badge of mild discomfort. [26] [27]
 
Therm-a-Rest remains one of the giants of the category, but it certainly did not get the last word. As backpacking split into traditional, lightweight, and ultralight camps, sleeping pads followed. Some hikers wanted plush inflatable comfort. Others wanted the lightest foam sheet that could technically be described as “not the ground.” Both groups, naturally, believed they were the reasonable ones.

One important name in the ultralight world is Gossamer Gear, founded in 1998 with a focus on extremely light backpacking equipment. Its Thinlight pad pushes minimalism almost to the point of satire: a one-eighth-inch closed-cell foam sheet measuring 59 by 19 inches and weighing only 2.7 ounces. It is less a mattress than a polite suggestion to the ground. But for gram-counters, it offers just enough cushioning, just enough insulation, and a surprising amount of versatility as a sit pad, frame sheet, or emergency layer.
[Gossamer Gear Thinlight c. 2020]
 
That ultralight impulse brings the story back to where it began. The earliest campers slept on boughs, grass, skins, and whatever they could gather. Modern ultralight hikers may carry space-age foam instead, but the underlying idea is surprisingly similar: use as little as possible, accept a little hardship, and call it freedom.

Space Blankets, R-Values, and Modern Camping Sleep Systems



There is just enough room in this story to squeeze in one last strange but important entry: the space blanket, also known as the Mylar blanket. At first glance it seems less like a sleeping pad and more like something handed to marathon finishers, rescue victims, and people who have made poor decisions despite the meteorologist's warnings. But it belongs here because it tackles the same old enemy from another angle: heat loss. A space blanket is a thin plastic sheet with a metallic coating that reflects radiant heat and blocks moisture at very low weight. Fully wrapping yourself in one can add meaningful warmth, though it also makes you look as if you are being prepared for leftovers.
[Mylar type emergency Blanket]
 
Like so many outdoor materials, reflective film moved through science, industry, and emergency use before becoming normal camping gear. Metal-coated plastic films were developed in the mid-twentieth century, and NASA helped popularize related reflective materials through the space program. There is something wonderfully circular about that: humans developed materials to escape Earth, then used them to sleep more comfortably on it. From there, they spread into the packs of campers trying to squeeze a few more degrees out of a cold night. [28] [29]

Reflective layers eventually found their way onto sleeping pads too. They do not turn a thin foam mat into a heated mattress, despite what a desperate camper might hope at 3 a.m., but they can help. The original Therm-a-Rest Z Lite had an R-value around 1.7, while the later reflective Z Lite Sol rose to about 2.0. A gain of 0.3 sounds laughably small until you are lying on frozen ground wondering how much dignity you would trade for one more degree of warmth. In the backcountry, tiny improvements can feel large.
[Therm-a-Rest Z-Lite Sol c. 2025]
 
The history of the camping mat is really the history of campers trying to make an unreasonable activity slightly more reasonable. It is also a small but revealing chapter in the larger evolution of outdoor gear. We want wild places, but we also want circulation in our hips. We want to travel light, but we do not want to feel every root personally. Over the last century and a half, that desire has produced bough beds, ticks, fur robes, horsehair pads, rubber air mattresses, closed-cell foam, self-inflating pads, accordion mats, ultralight foam sheets, and reflective films borrowed from the space age.

And still, the perfect backpacking bed remains just out of reach. Every generation seems to believe it is one material breakthrough away from solving outdoor sleep forever. Maybe someday we will have a pad that is weightless, warm, silent, indestructible, inexpensive, and as comfortable as home. Until then, the search continues—and so does the ancient camping ritual of rolling over at midnight, adjusting the pad, and pretending that this time, finally, you have found the soft spot.

For anyone interested in vintage backpacking gear, camping equipment history, or the strange little innovations that make nights outdoors more bearable, the sleeping pad is a reminder that even the least glamorous gear can carry a long story.
 
 
By David F. Garner
 

Sources


[1] Ruadhán Scrivener-Anderson, “WW1 Officer's Valise and Contents,” Jun 17, 2022, Dr Ruadhán Scrivener-Anderson, 5:08, https://youtu.be/41oPH3dQgac?si=DVefiwPWdHkyD9QP.


[2] Cpt. Whitehall, “Civil War Sleeping Bag,” May 5, 2019, Company D 2nd USSS, 8:26, https://youtu.be/yQD1udrTlWA?si=oSwPghtyidvoRAqV.


[3] Martin Hogue, Making Camp: A Visual History of Camping's Most Essential Items and Activities, chapter 7, “Sleeping Bag,” Kindle edition, p. 248.


[4] George O. Shields, Camping and Camp Outfits, (Rand, McNally & Company Publishers, 1890), 33-34, URL.


[5] E. Kreps, Camp and Trail Methods, Chapter V, Cooking Utensils, Beds and Bedding, A. R. Harding Pub, 1910, pg 46-54.


[6] Wohleber, Curt. “The Mattress.” Invention & Technology Magazine 21, no. 4 (Spring 2006). https://www.inventionandtech.com/content/mattress-0?page=2.


[7] Kenneth L. Holmes, ed., Best of Covered Wagon Women (University of Oklahoma Press, 2008), 45.


[8] Clinton T. Dent, Mountaineering (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1892), 64, URL.


[9] Horace Kephart, The Book of Camping and Woodcraft: A Guidebook for Those Who Travel in the Wilderness (New York: Outing Publishing Co., 1906), 135.


[10] Fordyce, C. P. “Autocamping Beds.” Outdoor Life 55, no. 6 (June 1925): 478–79. Digitized by Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/sim_outdoor-life_1925-06_55_6.


[11] “DuPont Nylon Air Mattress,” Outdoor Life 115, no. 2 (February 1955): 26, digitized by Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/sim_outdoor-life_1955-02_115_2.


[12] Daly, Lawrence E., and Robert W. Pooley. Process of making cellular material. US Patent 2,570,182, filed July 23, 1948, and issued October 9, 1951. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2570182A/en.


[13] Office of Technical Services. “Apparel.” Bibliography of Technical Reports 17, no. 4 (April 11, 1952): 125. Digitized by Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/sim_government-reports-announcements-index_1952-04-11_17_4_0.


[14] “Warm Feet,” New York Times, October 28, 1953, N1, digitized by Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/sim_new-york-times_1953-10-28_103_34976.


[15] American Alpine Club Safety Committee, Accidents in American Mountaineering (New York: American Alpine Club, 1954), 29, URL.


[16] U.S. Naval Medical School, Department of Cold Weather Medicine, Polar Manual (Bethesda, MD: National Naval Medical Center, 1961), 35, URL.


[17] Colin Fletcher, The Complete Walker: The Joys and Techniques of Hiking and Backpacking (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968), 174–75, URL.


[18] "How to Buy a Trail Bed," Backpacker, June 1977, 66.


[19] Andrew Harvard and Todd Thompson, Mountain of Storms: The American Expeditions to Dhaulagiri, 1969 & 1973 (New York: Chelsea House, 1974), 205, https://archive.org/details/mountainofstorms0000harv.


[20] Summit, vol. 12–13 (1966), 32, URL.

[21] James J. Beveridge, "The Best in Sleeping Bags and Tents for the Backpacker," Field & Stream, April 1972, 92, URL.


[22] Encyclopedia of American Biography, “Stein, Leo,” (New York: American Historical Company, 1963), 477, URL.


[23] Cascade Designs. “Thermarest - Our History.” Therm-a-Rest. Accessed September 2, 2026. https://cascadedesigns.com/pages/thermarest-our-history.


[24] Ibid.


[25] Halfway Anywhere, Therm-a-Rest Z Lite Sol review


[26] Erps, Keith. “Which Side Is ‘Up’ on a Z Lite & Other Burning Questions.” Therm-a-Rest Blog. Cascade Designs, July 31, 2024. https://cascadedesigns.com/blogs/thermarest-gear/which-side-is-up-on-a-zlite.


[27] Therm-a-Rest Team. “50 Years of Better Sleep.” Therm-a-Rest Blog. Cascade Designs, January 4, 2022. https://cascadedesigns.com/blogs/thermarest-stories/50-years-of-better-sleep.


[28] National Aeronautics and Space Administration. “Reflecting on Space Benefits: A Shining Example.” NASA Spinoff. NASA, 2006. https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2006/ch_9.html.


[29] Wikipedia, s.v. “Mylar.” Last modified July 27, 2026, 19:41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoPET.